15 May

The full logic (and context) of yes and no

Hero banner: dark blue gradient with concentric rings and a gold 'yes' at center, title 'The full logic of yes and no' on the right.
A yes from Beijing and a yes from Amsterdam can come out of the same mouth in the same meeting and mean radically different things. A reference-grade walk through the four cross-cultural frameworks — Hofstede, GLOBE, WVS, Schwartz — and the two psychological theories underneath that explain why.
Read More
10 May

What is my colleague’s salary? I have the right to know!

Infographic titled 'Same work' showing salary bars for three senior managers: €87,500, €105,000 and €128,000 with figures and icons beneath.
The EU Pay Transparency Directive shifts the burden of proof onto the employer. A pay difference will now require an objective, documented justification, or a correction. "She negotiated harder when she joined" is not a defence. "He's been here longer" might be — if your tenure logic is documented. The leaders who navigate this well will be the ones who do the work before the questions arrive. Conversation by conversation, fairness becomes a leadership problem.
Read More
23 Apr

Leading in the Waiting Room: How to Hold Your Team Together When the Organization Hasn’t Decided Yet on Organizational Changes

Abstract illustration of golden human figures forming a crowd under a spotlight inside a stylized arena.
When four of your twelve team members may be made redundant — but nothing is official yet — leadership becomes something different. It becomes the art of holding people together in uncertainty. This post offers six practical principles for leading through the wait: with honesty, focus, differentiation, and the kind of steadiness that people will remember long after the decision is made.
Read More
17 Apr

Getting Influential: Getting More Things Done

icons of people connected in various way and circles representing various levels; by salomons.coach
Most managers have two default tools when they need something to happen: tell people what to do, or escalate to someone who can. Direct communication and the chain of command. Both have their place. But if they are your primary or only tools for getting things done across an organization, you have a problem. Not because they don't work, but because they work less and less the higher you climb and the more complex your environment becomes. The managers and project managers who consistently get things done are not the ones with the biggest title or the loudest voice. They are the ones who understand that in most modern organisations, influence is the currency that actually moves things. Directives produce...
Read More
15 Mar

“Not Strategic Enough”: The Label That Hides the Real Problem

The phrase “not strategic enough” is one of the most common labels used when leaders hit an invisible career ceiling. But in executive teams it often hides a deeper problem — unclear expectations, power dynamics, or low psychological safety. Before developing the individual, leaders must first examine the system that produced the label.
Read More
18 Feb

How to create ownership in organizations

Ownership in organizations is often treated as a mindset problem. In reality, it is a design issue. When goals are unclear, authority and accountability are misaligned, and leadership behavior is inconsistent, ownership erodes. This article explains why ownership is not something you demand from people, but something you deliberately build through structure, behavior, and leadership discipline.
Read More
18 Jan

The rules of an excellent leadership dialogue

Excellent leadership dialogue is not about open discussion without boundaries. It is a disciplined practice that creates shared understanding, surfaces real differences, and leads to genuine commitment. When leaders avoid constructive conflict or rush to agreement, alignment becomes fragile and execution suffers. The strongest leadership teams invest in dialogue first, so commitment follows naturally, without the need to manage appearances.
Read More
18 Jan

From agreement to commitment: why real alignment is built in dialogue

Many leadership teams mistake agreement for commitment. When dialogue is rushed and constructive conflict is avoided, alignment becomes something that must be shown rather than earned. People comply, but they do not commit. Real alignment is built earlier, through disciplined dialogue, the courage to surface different perspectives, and the willingness to stay in the conversation until shared understanding emerges. When leaders invest in that process, commitment follows naturally. And when commitment is real, alignment no longer needs to be managed, it simply shows.
Read More